On Rapture Forums, David Reagan argues against competitors for access to the
wealth souls of the differently-mentalled.
Even fundamentalist type groups have gotten caught up in cultic doctrines
“Even” indeed. By definition, surely.
“What is a cult? The typical dictionary definition is so vague and general that the term could be applied to any religious group”
Recognising that this might leave some understandable confusion in the minds of Rapture followers, he proceeds to define a cult. It seems that he is talking about defining cults as millenarian cults, but that bald definition might pose something of a problem, (What with them being the very essence of a millenarian sect.)
So there’s a list of attributes that define “cults” then a list of those religions that qualify and some that are “borderline” sects. The distinction rests on whether they have “an orthodox view of Jesus as God in the flesh.” The list of sects has:
..among others, the non-instrumental Churches of Christ, the United Pentecostals, and Catholics.
Cults always have some weird doctrines that are not Biblically based.
Hmm, nothing at all weird about these things selected at random from Rapture Forums:
then. The Ages as viewed from different standpoints , Scripture Numerics, the Tribulation 101 Science facts and foreknowledge from the Bible
These drawings and words seem to have been generated from a mindset oriented about 45 degrees from standard human thinking.
So, what do you call an organisation that has “weird doctrines that are Biblically based”?
Hmm, tough one. Maybe, it’s a “Rapture Forum”?