Posted on 17th June, 2007 by TW
The latest entry from the Department of Missing the Point Completely is by Fr. Robert J. Carr and titled “Making Fool’s For Satan.” (Big hat tip to the Friendly Atheist)
In a nutshell, Father Carr has decided to rant against the Blasphemy Challenge but obviously has not been guided by his invisible friend as he does so. As a result, he not only misses the point about the challenge, but seems to get a bit confused over the whole issue of belief and what the Christian church teaches (or at least did when I went to school). Friendly Atheist has done an excellent job of fisking the (ahem) article so I wont do that here, but there are a couple of points I want to pick up on.
Popularity: 33% [?]
Popularity: 33% [?]
This post has been tagged with: Anti-Atheist, Atheism, atheist, Blasphemy, Blasphemy-Challenge, catholic-church, Catholicism, Christian, Church, culture, Logic, Philosophy, Rational-Response-Squad, Religion, religious-nonsense, Religious-Nutter, RRS, Society and woo.
You can read related articles in the General or Philosophy or Society categories - this post currently has 2 comments »
Posted on 19th May, 2007 by TW
I know I should have learned my lesson long ago and I promise to stop responding to Parabiodox’s baiting after this post… (At least I will try).
Previously, I made a post about Christian humour in which I commented that the expected answer to a ranting comment would be “Atheists (agnostics etc)” rather than the Abrahamic religions I previously claimed. Now, I never meant this to imply Atheists were the same as agnostics, and if anyone did take away that impression from my (lengthy) post than I apologise wholeheartedly.
I am fully aware Atheism is not Agnosticism, and personally I do not find “agnosticism” a reasonable viewpoint which can be counted as an opinion. Agnosticism is (remember this is my personal viewpoint!) a good point of view for something about which you have no opinion. I am agnostic as to the existence of life on a planet orbiting Beta Canis Major for example. I am not agnostic about the existence of Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, Leprechauns, Pixies, Elves, Orcs, Gobilins, Demons, pink Unicorns or all manner of imaginary nonsense. What on Earth gives a particular religion special privileges about it’s claims to the existence of one (or more) deities? I will return to this.
Popularity: 46% [?]
Popularity: 46% [?]
This post has been tagged with: Anti-Atheist, Argument, Atheism, Ayn-Rand, Belief, Beliefs, bigotry, charlatan, Christianity, Christians, Crazy, culture, Logic, Logical-Fallacy, Philosophy, Religion, Religious-Nutter, Society, Theist and Toutatis.
You can read related articles in the Philosophy or Society categories - this post currently has 1 comment »
Posted on 13th May, 2007 by TW
Well, from the department of the ineducable idiocy, I have found a blog which I don’t for one second think is a legit creationist / theist blog. I refuse to accept that anyone can be as stupid as this person, yet still be able to breathe unaided. Seriously. Still, it has given me a chance to rant about a few topics which have been annoying me lately.
The blog in question is called “Atheist Stooges” and, from that name alone, you just know it is going to be full of juicy idiocy. In this instance, the idiocy is so bizare I can only assume (hope?) that this is a wind up. Can people honestly hold to ideas like this and still function in society?
The blog has an article called “Enter the excavation” which really does hit a new nadir of nonsense. The basic crux of what is a long, wordy and badly written, post is that because you can not pin down a point in time which some human invented Atheism it must be sent by demons. What wonderful logic. There are so many fallacies in the post it would take months to unravel them all. This tends to happen when you take a false premise and try to make conclusions based on it though.
The opening paragraph sets the tone:
Do you know that if you make an endeavor to find out when and by whom atheism was authored you will not be able to find such information from any source? Not even the most “educated” atheists - particularly those associated with the most elite universities throughout the world can truthfully inform you when and by whom atheism originated. They can enlighten you as to who were its main perpetuators in different cultures; but they cannot identify its founder and when it actually originated.
Popularity: 64% [?]
Popularity: 64% [?]
This post has been tagged with: Atheism, atheist, Crackpot, Crackpottery, crank, Creation, Creationism, Creationist-Fools, Creationist-Idiots, Deities, ID, idiocy, Idiot, Infinity, insane, intelligent-design, Irrational, Logical-Fallacy, nutcase, pascal, pascals-wager, Ranting-Christian-Fool, Religion, Religious-Delusion, religious-fool, Religious-Intolerance, Religious-Nutter, Society, Theist and woo.
You can read related articles in the Society categories - this post currently has 9 comments »