Neo-Objectivism<\/a> at Wikipedia.<\/p>\n“There is nothing wrong in using ideas, anybody’s ideas. Provided that you give appropriate credit, you can make any mixture of ideas that you want; the contradiction will be yours. But why do you need the name of someone (or their philosophy) with whom you do not agree in order to spread your misunderstandings — or worse, your nonsense and falsehoods?” (From “The Moratorium on Brains,” Question and Answer Period.)<\/p>\n
Now I wonder who she could be talking about ?<\/p>\n
This is really a bit of a no-brainer and is really rhetorical but even so I can’t resist giving you a further clue.<\/p>\n
What faith\/belief system spends most of it’s time attacking other faiths and beliefs in an effort to mask the fact that it has nothing of substance to offer itself?<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\nNow, personally I think I know where the dig is aimed, but the answer to the question is “Abrahamic Religions (Judaeo-Christianity and Islam)<\/em>” surely?<\/p>\n[tags]Parabiodox, Christian Nutter, Nutter, Christian, Ayn Rand, Belief, Abraham, Religion, Philosophy, Culture, Society, Atheism, Anti-Atheist[\/tags]<\/p>\n