Flock of Dodos: Behind Modern Creationism & Intelligent Design<\/strong>
\nCambridge House Press, Inc. (release date 02.28.07)
\nBy Barrett Brown, Jon P. Alston<\/p>\nBook Description<\/p>\n
What is creationism? Is it science, theology, both, neither? Who\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s behind it? What does it mean for Western Civilization? And why should you give a damn in the first place? National Lampoon veteran Barrett Brown and Professor of Sociology Jon P. Alston, Ph.D, answer these questions \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and perhaps one or two others \u00e2\u20ac\u201d in a superbly unorthodox, serenely offensive and splendidly hilarious look at the forces behind the most talked-about pseudo-theory in modern history.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Now, you really cant help but chuckle at this book and the mountains of Righteous Indignation it seems to have stirred up in the ID\/Creationism camps. The comments are priceless.<\/p>\n
Amadan writes : “I wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t worry about whoopee-cushion type propaganda like that. Thought Always Rebuts Darwinism.<\/em>”<\/p>\nSadly, history appears to show the opposite.<\/p>\n
Dodgingcars writes : (emphasis mine) “I think some of you have made good points. At first, it was their policy to ignore ID. Now, because they can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t properly dispute it, they mock it and attack those who accept it. It does appear the tide is turning. We already know that something like 70-80% of Americans believe in ID (though they don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t know that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s what they believe) in some form<\/strong>. Once they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re more educated as to what ID is, the theory of evolution will lose validity in the eyes of most people in America \u00e2\u20ac\u201d this is what scares the Darwinists.<\/em>”<\/p>\nHere we go again. Sadly, ID supporters seem to regularly argue that ID should be a science because so many people believe in it. The mind truly boggles at this nonsense. In reality, if evolution loses validity in the eyes of most people in America, the only losers will be Americans who will produce generations of students who are unable to study how diseases evolve and how species can develop over time. Creationism is a dead end. Sadly, the Christian nutters actually want that. Oh yeah, ID is not a religious idea is it, it isn’t tied to any one religion is it?<\/p>\n
Columbo write : (again, my emphasis) “I hope that, beyond lambasting and complaining about this kind of c-rap, defenders of science and general truth-seeking will become real activists in their own neighborhoods. E.g. 1) buy extra copies of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Privileged Planet\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Mystery of Life\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and loan them to co-workers and neighbors; 2) Volunteer to teach a series on this subject to high school and college groups at your church<\/strong>; 3) write book reviews \/ letters to the editor in your local paper; 4) meet with your representatives and give them succinct outlines and talking points to work from<\/em>.”<\/p>\nNow, I know that this is not really proof ID and Religion (Christianity) are massively interlinked (yet they are), but I certainly find it ironic that the assumption appears to be all the ID supporters are active members of their church. I suspect they are. (More on the book next time)<\/p>\n