A couple of days ago I made a post titled “Atheist Resurgance<\/a>” which was written after I had been meandering around the results of some technorati tag searches<\/a>.<\/p>\n One of these links took me to a blog titled “Sub Ratione Dei: A Balanced Victory<\/a>” where I read some of the comments made about Richard Dawkins, and his book The God Delusion<\/a>. In the post, I made the following comments:<\/p>\n A theology student who feels that, as a theology student he is more placed to talk about God than Dawkins. This is interesting as the God delusion is not about the Christian deity per se, but about the implications belief in a divine being have on humanity and the biological evidence which contradicts those beliefs. Maybe the author of Sub Ratione Dei feels that as a theology student they are more placed to discuss evolution and creationism than Dawkins.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Following my post here, the author of the Sub Ratione Dei blog has made the following response<\/a>:<\/p>\n Update: This post has generated a little comment over on Why Don’t You … Blog?<\/a> For one they are maybe taking me a bit too seriously (alway’s a mistake). However, I am perhaps more worried by the implicit message that I am a creationist!<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
\n