<\/a>Adding to some of the odd things about technorati<\/a>, I am going to revisit some complaints that have been made previously. Are blogs dying under the weight of spamblogs?<\/p>\n

Let’s take lomography<\/a> as an example. This is an interesting topic and you would think there were more than a handful of people who were obsessive enough about this that the blogsphere would be well populated. As a counter weight “Lomography” returns over 30,000 hits on flickr, with lomo generating over a hundred thousand hits. People are obsessive about it \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n

<\/a>A search on technorati (http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/ tag\/ Lomography<\/a>) turns up some interesting results. Sadly, you have to wade through some real dross until you hit an actual page about lomography. When I did the search just now, only four of the first ten were not single page advert blogs (eg Pinhole lomography.com<\/a>) which appear to serve no other purpose than try to get you to buy something (or worse are just an inbound link farm).<\/p>\n

Of the four which were legit one was the previous post here (http:\/\/www.whydontyou.org.uk\/blog\/2006\/11\/19\/digital-storage\/<\/a>), which although it is excellent ( \ud83d\ude42 ) it isn’t really about lomography – it just has a link to Technorati search on the topic.<\/p>\n

Well the web 2.0 may well be the social networking phenomenon to change the web, but so far it is a marketing scam of massive proportions.<\/p>\n

Technorati tags: Lomography<\/a>, Cameras<\/a>, Digital Photography<\/a>, Editing<\/a>, Effects<\/a>, Technology<\/a>, Technorati<\/a><\/p>\n

Flickr tags: lomography<\/a>, lomo<\/a><\/p>\n