(Old news from the department of simple answers)<\/p>\n
My time away has meant that some of the weird and wonderful nonsense over the last few weeks has escaped the harsh light of reality. Take this little blinder<\/a> posted by Joanna Sugden to the Times Online on 2 May 08.<\/p>\n The article is titled: “Is the Bible science fiction?<\/strong>”<\/p>\n Simple answer: “Yes” (Or slight variation: “No, it is fantasy fiction”)<\/p>\n Why is there any need for more debate? Strangely, debate there is… As you can imagine, the article talks about “debate” as to the veracity of Noah’s Ark. It seems that some people over the age of six actually think that two of every species on Earth was crammed into the Ark to survive a world flood. Wonderfully, IMDB list a film about this under “Science Fiction Literature” which I think is a GoodThing\u2122. The first to kick it off is Rick Beekman<\/a> who is certainly a “person of faith” (and, I suspect with no real evidence, an American):<\/p>\n I believe the story of Noah’s Ark. I also believe all the stories in The Bible. Word salad. This is nothing but an assertion of his belief with an appeal to ridicule against anyone who disagrees. The unusual capitalisation is always a good sign of a nutjob – I hope he doesn’t have access to firearms. After this start, he continues:<\/p>\n The reason for these stories is to teach we lowly humans what God has done..And what he can and will do.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Scary. I find myself agreeing with the insane. Dear Toutatis save me. Actually, the bit I agree with is the reason of the story. They are not supposed to be factual representations of the past. They are there to “teach” (for want of a better word) people about their belief system. This subtle fact is lost on Rick – despite the fact he worded it in quite a good way, I suppose that was just chance. (Monkeys, typewriters…) Anyway, after a bit more drivel he finishes off:<\/p>\n In Genesis 8 v 4 we read where the Ark rested upon Mt. Ararat as the waters receded. WTF? Seriously, what sort of insane leap of faith is this? How did “something” become a “large ship” in the space of a full stop? Quantum physics be damned! (Why is water capitalised?) Critically, why have none of the ultra rich evangelical groups over the world got a more recent ultra high res photograph to confirm – or just gone there on an expedition? Madness like this gives me a headache.<\/p>\n My faith in human nature is restored by a run of sensible comments, but then Rick returns<\/a>:<\/p>\n John; Ah the way of the madness runs true in this one. This at least shows there is no science in the bible or in creationism. Basically this is Rick saying he doesn’t care what feeble evidence there is, he knows his Invisible Friend can do things other people can’t. Well done Rick. There are seven year olds kicking themselves in shame at this…<\/p>\n
\nEqually great is the predictable response of the loonies.<\/p>\n
\nThe ones who don’t believe it are the usual group of scoffers..Atheists..Secular Humanists.Those Who generally think everything has an Explanation based on their worldly but non-spiritual understanding of Events in the Bible they deem “Impossible”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\nSattelite Photos confirm taken in 1972 that something very large is encased in Ice on top of that Mountain.
\nHow could any large Ship get up there unless Water rested it there as The Bible says?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\nGod our Creator can do whatever he pleases. He usually does things to suit his purposes not necessarily for what we think. He knows The end from the beginning. God could have chosen to just let everyone drop dead except the chosen animals etc and of course Noah and his family. There is no human now or past or in the future who is any match for the Wisdom and creator.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n