Incoherent rambling is not completely unheard of on this blog. So I was prepared to give Eagleton some benefit of the doubt on his ramble about whether Jesus was “Messiah or Eagleton’s answer to the patently absurd question is summarised in the tag line as<\/p>\n The Christ of the Gospels is indeed a revolutionary – but of a millenarian, rather than a political, stripe<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Wikipedia get a bad press in universities – quoting it will supposedly get you a fail mark – but I’d definitely say that, on the basis of Wikipedia’s definitions of these terms, the answer is clearly “No Jesus wasn’t a Bolshevik.<\/a> As to whether he qualifies as a Messiah, that depends which definition you are using. Maybe he was indeed anointed with oil.<\/a><\/p>\n
\nBolshevik”, on the Guardian’s Comment is Free.<\/a> However, this turns out to be an “edited excerpt from Terry Eagleton’s introduction to The Gospels” so I’m treating it as fair game.<\/p>\n