It seems the World Trade Organisation is drawing back a bit from using its financial muscle against the EU over GM food**, according to an International Herald Tribune story.<\/a><\/p>\n .. the World Trade Organization said Thursday that the European Union would be given more time to end blockages on imports of engineered foods like corn. This is quite a complicated, not to mention dull, story that I can’t really summarise without losing focus on the facts, but, basically, some EU countries and politicians object to having to open their markets to GM products on ecological grounds.<\/p>\n This has involved some heavy international pressure for “free trade” being brought to bear on the EU. From the BBC, in 2006, <\/a> after the EU had even folded and allowed US sweetcorn in.<\/p>\n Two years ago the moratorium was lifted and a modified strain of sweet corn, grown mainly in the US, was allowed onto the market. Well, that sounds like a laudable aim, doesn’t it? Deciding issues on scientific rather than political grounds? Who could argue with that? Hmm. So the decision to push GM foods onto countries that really really don’t want them could not possibly be politically motivated then….. The wide antagonism to GM foods in Europe is “political” while the desire of big agribiz to sell seeds and crops is merely scientific.<\/p>\n
\n“The period during which the EU was meant to have worked this out expired, and the parties decided to extend the deadline to Jan. 11,” said Keith Rockwell, a spokesman for the WTO.
\nThe EU had been due to end the blockages by Nov. 21……
\nArgentina, Canada and the United States have sued the European Union at the WTO, which ruled last year that a de facto EU ban on imports of genetically modified foods between 1984 and 2004 was illegal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\nBut Washington continued with the WTO case because it wanted to be sure approvals for GMO sales were being decided on scientific rather than political grounds.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n