We’ve been tagged by the excellent no more hornets<\/a> blog with another meme. This time it is the “Evolution<\/em>” meme<\/a>. I am tempted to say that whydontyou blog actually disproves Intelligent Design by its very nature, as it definitely seems to be the product of chance events.<\/p>\n It’s a pity that we don’t have visual records because the look of the blog has changed a good few times, losing visibility a good few times when we’ve tried to change the theme. We tried a few themes, altered them a bit and finally decided it would be better to have control over the appearance of the site. Hence, we’ve had to learn how to create WordPress themes in the meantime and have even released some into the wild. This has brought us a weird collection of blogs that carry our name in the “designed by” bit at the bottom, with most ironically, a number of religious and even fundamentalist blogs, as well as (I kid you not) a penis enlargement blog.<\/p>\n The very first post here basically said Welcome<\/a>. The next post was a recommendation for a book on philiosophy.<\/a> I see a bit of a theme starting there:<\/p>\n Throughout the book Jamie Whyte uses logic to expose the common fallacies TW’s next few posts are also pretty interesting, a lot more astronomy and tech-centred than they tend to be now. My own posts soon degenerated into whinges about search engines being rubbish, so I’ll draw a veil over them.<\/p>\n We were much slacker about blogging in 2006. Whole months passed without many posts. But then nobody ever commented except on Ajax or Linux posts and we had no idea if anyone else ever read the blog.<\/p>\n I know the meme wants 6 posts but I’d listed too few, so now I’m going to list too many. A few selected posts from the old ones are Atheist belief<\/a>, Prove or disprove<\/a>, Linux partial success<\/a> Happy Easter<\/a><\/p>\n The earliest post that is still unaccountably getting hits every day is a couple of lines pointing to an online source for Viking names<\/a> with a sister post about Anglo-Saxon kings’ names that never gets hits although it has some actual content of its own. A lesson there maybe.<\/p>\n Other unaccountably still-hit-daily posts are the ones on food<\/a>, imaginary megaliths in Liverpool<\/a> and our alltime favourite, How to defend religion<\/a> because it got us called an “entertaining blog” on the Times (We were planning to get t-shirts made) and got so many hits it temporarily broke our server.<\/p>\n Throughout the rest of the 2006, the blog rambled along, with some good posts, some rubbish ones. Very early in the blog, TW started posting on some of themes that he’s stuck to – including rubbish shops, internet magazines and digital photography. On one post, showing a photo of the Mithraic Temple on Hadrian’s Wall<\/a>, he made this blog’s possibly first reference to the Biblical rains that have become a feature of the UK in the past year or so.<\/p>\n There were also plenty of anti-religion, anti-ID-cards and anti-1984-in-the-21st-century posts. The anti-ID stuff is starting to feel increasingly like flogging the proverbial dead horse, as more and more civil liberties disappear down the pan, so I think we’ve eased up on that a bit – not through optimism that the issue is dead but through despair that anyone can prevent it.<\/p>\n From January 2007, we were on the Atheist Blogroll, courtesy of an invitation via the sainted Nullifidian.<\/a> This started to bring in some actual regular commenters, who constantly put us to shame, almost always outdoing the post they are commenting on, with their wit and wisdom,. (Bastards.)<\/p>\n This inspired us to try to hold a comment week<\/a>, in which we commented on everything we read and solicited comments from anyone who was willing. This worked out pretty well except for me, at least, having to interpret “comment on everything” I read as meaning comment on blogs I read that have an easy-to-submit-a-comment capacity. (Registering with a google username or registering to read someone’s blog don’t count as “easy” for me.) After a few abortive attempts to comment on blogs that I really enjoyed, I also realised that it’s very lame to just say “I really enjoyed this” or “good post” so I often didn’t. It’s much easier to comment when you strongly disagree, of course, but I did little of that either, not much caring to argue the toss with nutters.<\/p>\n We are supposed to tag another 6 blogs and, obviously naming already-tagged ones would be pointless. There’s a good chance that the tagged blogs won’t thank us either. And I can think of a good few more that I’d like to pick, but Ill stick with the first half-dozen that come to mind. So here goes.
\nthat surround us day to day – ranging from the false authority given to victims of tragedies through to sheer evasive lies from the rich and powerful.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\nNullifidian<\/a>
\nAtheist Perspective<\/a>
\nX is ….<\/a>
\nAtheist ethicist<\/a>
\nClioaudio<\/a>
\nBlack Sun Journal<\/a><\/p>\nShare this:<\/h3>