Posted on 5th June, 2007 by TW
For the interests of people who read this blog sans comments (shame on you), I have “promoted” a short debate taking place in the comments of Heather’s post titled “ID Advocates Never Sleep.” I have done this, largely, because I think it is interesting and one side of the debate shows how a misconception about the applicability of a theory over different domains can lead to all manner of, what I think is, illogical reasoning.
Please feel free to add any comments of your own, either here or on the original post. This is quite long, and it broadly just repeats posts from previously so it is under the fold for those viewing on the blog.
Popularity: 36% [?]
Popularity: 36% [?]
This post has been tagged with: Biologists, Creation, Creationism, culture, Darwin, Dawkins, Design, Engineering, Engineers, Evolution, ID, intelligent-design, Logic, Marx, nonsense, Philosophy, popper, Science, Social-Sciences, Sociology and woo.
You can read related articles in the Philosophy or Science categories - this post currently has 12 comments »
Posted on 6th November, 2006 by Heather
I am usually silent about the failings of technorati & blogger etc, which is mainly because my knowledge of these things is barely more than minimal.
However, I thought I’d put my own whine in now. I was reading back through the posts on technorati, etc (I can’t keep blaming technorati - it’s pretty fair, compared to g**gle) I saw one blog that had been tagged Stonehenge on del.icio.us and I followed that tag. Not only did this post not appear on the tag page, the ones shown on the page included a post from 2003. Do these pages get updated on an annual basis?
Popularity: 14% [?]
Popularity: 14% [?]
