Quite – yes it will, but the conclusion it will only relate to the upbringing of the individual child or the faith group. So the grouping – the label – is irrelevant to their quality of life. If it’s irrelevant then Dawkins objection to it amounts to subjective dislike, which is where he came in in the first place.
Intrigued, but not convinced.
]]>Is the fact that Churches worldwide are still collecting “amazing sums” during a recession a good thing?
]]>Phillip Pullman states the following about his “fictional†books for children, “I don’t think I’m writing fantasy. I think I’m writing realism. My books are psychologically real.†But what does he really write about? As he has admitted, “My books are about killing God†and “I’m trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief.â€
More evidence here:
http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/11/deceptive-manipulative-propagandist.html
Yet again, atheists are collecting “amazing sums†during a time of worldwide recession not in order to help anyone in real material need but in order to attempt to demonstrate just how clever they consider themselves to be—while actually loudly, proudly and expensively demonstrating their ignorance and arrogance—need any more be said?
]]>I think it is hilarious that Almighty God has arranged for children of evangelical Christian parents to be “chosen†for this campaign.
Well that is certainly one viewpoint, but not one I would share. It is good to see, though, that you feel your god would support what is essentially an atheist campaign.
I agree with this, I think if your god does exist he would be more in favour of atheists than christians.
They are obviously very happy, and thus show how great a Christian upbringing is.
So if I show you a picture of sad christian children will that show how bad such an upbringing is? Likewise, if I show you pictures of very happy atheist children will that show how great an atheist upbringing is?
]]>