<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I am the Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/</link>
	<description>Challenging the Zeitgeist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:20:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Barefoot Bum</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-12184</link>
		<dc:creator>The Barefoot Bum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/?p=1522#comment-12184</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve put Clark&#039;s spin on Hanlon&#039;s Razor (perhaps one could call it Heller&#039;s Law) as my motto: &quot;Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve put Clark&#8217;s spin on Hanlon&#8217;s Razor (perhaps one could call it Heller&#8217;s Law) as my motto: &#8220;Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TW</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-12179</link>
		<dc:creator>TW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/?p=1522#comment-12179</guid>
		<description>You need to get all these laws added to Wikipedia so when someone else, in the future, tries to claim ownership you can trounce them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to get all these laws added to Wikipedia so when someone else, in the future, tries to claim ownership you can trounce them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-12178</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/?p=1522#comment-12178</guid>
		<description>Karen

Some great Laws.  We should submit some to wikipedia....

I have another Powerpoint one:

The likelihood that a speaker will read out every word on a Powerpoint presentation increases in direct relationship  to the dullness of the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen</p>
<p>Some great Laws.  We should submit some to wikipedia&#8230;.</p>
<p>I have another Powerpoint one:</p>
<p>The likelihood that a speaker will read out every word on a Powerpoint presentation increases in direct relationship  to the dullness of the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-12177</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/?p=1522#comment-12177</guid>
		<description>Karen&#039;s law of software: that which has not been tested &lt;i&gt;by definition&lt;/i&gt; does not work.  I spent several years trying to pound this through the heads of clueless software  managers, who refused to allocate enough test time.

I&#039;m on thinner ice with this one, but I&#039;ll offer it as a hypothesis: the success of a marriage is loosely correlated with the inverse of the number of wedding guests.  (Happily married 28 years this June; 18 wedding attendees, including the priest, the harpsichordist, and the neighbor&#039;s cat who wandered into the church during the ceremony.)

The law of powerpoint presentations:  The  number of your slides that really are clearly readable when projected at 72-dpi goes in inverse proportion to the importance of the presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen&#8217;s law of software: that which has not been tested <i>by definition</i> does not work.  I spent several years trying to pound this through the heads of clueless software  managers, who refused to allocate enough test time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m on thinner ice with this one, but I&#8217;ll offer it as a hypothesis: the success of a marriage is loosely correlated with the inverse of the number of wedding guests.  (Happily married 28 years this June; 18 wedding attendees, including the priest, the harpsichordist, and the neighbor&#8217;s cat who wandered into the church during the ceremony.)</p>
<p>The law of powerpoint presentations:  The  number of your slides that really are clearly readable when projected at 72-dpi goes in inverse proportion to the importance of the presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TW</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-12175</link>
		<dc:creator>TW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/?p=1522#comment-12175</guid>
		<description>Now that really is a law...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that really is a law&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/12/i-am-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-12173</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/?p=1522#comment-12173</guid>
		<description>Skitt&#039;s Law - a corollary of Murphy&#039;s Law, variously expressed as &quot;any post correcting an error in another post will contain at least one error itself&quot; or &quot;the likelihood of an error in a post is directly proportional to the embarrassment it will cause the poster.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skitt&#8217;s Law &#8211; a corollary of Murphy&#8217;s Law, variously expressed as &#8220;any post correcting an error in another post will contain at least one error itself&#8221; or &#8220;the likelihood of an error in a post is directly proportional to the embarrassment it will cause the poster.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
