For example, depending on the situation you could take a range of RAWs from -5 to 5 at 1/3 stop increments – would that be more of an HDR file than one taken with the “standard” three (-2,0, 2) exposures?
There is no hard and fast way of saying how many images are needed for a file to be “HDR,” so as I see it, it is just purist pedantry to say a single RAW cant make an HDR Image.
]]>True HDR is able to capture very hard lighting situations.
]]>