<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cynical science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/12/02/cynical-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/12/02/cynical-science/</link>
	<description>Challenging the Zeitgeist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:20:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nullifidian</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/12/02/cynical-science/comment-page-1/#comment-9299</link>
		<dc:creator>nullifidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/12/02/cynical-science/#comment-9299</guid>
		<description>Oh, I certainly can&#039;t claim credit for TWAT, I&#039;m afraid I have to leave that to Sky News (and others of that ilk) who, for reasons best known to themselves, decided that the screen graphic for same should have the words ordered downwards, one per line and left aligned, for weeks on end after 11th September 2001.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I certainly can&#8217;t claim credit for TWAT, I&#8217;m afraid I have to leave that to Sky News (and others of that ilk) who, for reasons best known to themselves, decided that the screen graphic for same should have the words ordered downwards, one per line and left aligned, for weeks on end after 11th September 2001.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alun</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/12/02/cynical-science/comment-page-1/#comment-9296</link>
		<dc:creator>Alun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/12/02/cynical-science/#comment-9296</guid>
		<description>Is it &lt;em&gt;cynical&lt;/em&gt; to discount UFO conspiracies? &quot;I’ve heard this nonsense before and it was proved false then,&quot; is an argument based on previous experience. To me that sounds sceptical rather than purely cynical, but it depends on how you think about the words. The two aren&#039;t as exclusive as I suggest. Perhaps I should have used the word &lt;em&gt;dogmatic&lt;/em&gt; as a comparison instead.

As for Evolutionary Psychology I found David Buller&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.niu.edu/phil/~buller/research/adaptingminds.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adapting Minds&lt;/a&gt; a good read if a little heavy going in places. It&#039;s available as a paperback which makes it surprisingly affordable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it <em>cynical</em> to discount UFO conspiracies? &#8220;I’ve heard this nonsense before and it was proved false then,&#8221; is an argument based on previous experience. To me that sounds sceptical rather than purely cynical, but it depends on how you think about the words. The two aren&#8217;t as exclusive as I suggest. Perhaps I should have used the word <em>dogmatic</em> as a comparison instead.</p>
<p>As for Evolutionary Psychology I found David Buller&#8217;s <a href="http://www.niu.edu/phil/~buller/research/adaptingminds.shtml" rel="nofollow">Adapting Minds</a> a good read if a little heavy going in places. It&#8217;s available as a paperback which makes it surprisingly affordable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
