<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The atheist bike?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/</link>
	<description>Challenging the Zeitgeist</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TW</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/#comment-9209</link>
		<dc:creator>TW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/#comment-9209</guid>
		<description>This is a comment on the times review of the film:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The reason this movie was probably so lame was due to the fact that it was NOT based on our Lord. Instead it sounds like it has been based on demons and magic. Children should not be subjected to this sort of thing. And we wonder what is wrong with the world today and our precious children.

rachel, canton, OH&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How funny is that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a comment on the times review of the film:</p>
<blockquote><p>The reason this movie was probably so lame was due to the fact that it was NOT based on our Lord. Instead it sounds like it has been based on demons and magic. Children should not be subjected to this sort of thing. And we wonder what is wrong with the world today and our precious children.</p>
<p>rachel, canton, OH</p></blockquote>
<p>How funny is that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TW</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/#comment-9208</link>
		<dc:creator>TW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/#comment-9208</guid>
		<description>Apparently this film has had a bit of secular slating as well. The times review of it (&lt;a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/film_reviews/article2956068.ece" rel="nofollow"&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;) is a bit harsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently this film has had a bit of secular slating as well. The times review of it (<a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/film_reviews/article2956068.ece" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/entertainment.timesonline.co.uk');">online</a>) is a bit harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XanderG</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/#comment-9205</link>
		<dc:creator>XanderG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/11/27/the-atheist-bike/#comment-9205</guid>
		<description>Who cares about an atheist movie? I want some of this 'candy-coated atheism'! It sounds deliciously rational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about an atheist movie? I want some of this &#8216;candy-coated atheism&#8217;! It sounds deliciously rational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
