<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phone Masts Not Harmful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/</link>
	<description>Challenging the Zeitgeist</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TW</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-8394</link>
		<dc:creator>TW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-8394</guid>
		<description>While this seems like a reasonable line of thought I am not a big fan of agnosticism in general.

For example, we have no evidence that exposure to air fresheners are not harmful to children. It is reasonable to assume they are harmful until proven otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this seems like a reasonable line of thought I am not a big fan of agnosticism in general.</p>
<p>For example, we have no evidence that exposure to air fresheners are not harmful to children. It is reasonable to assume they are harmful until proven otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phone mast agnostic</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-8393</link>
		<dc:creator>phone mast agnostic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 09:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-8393</guid>
		<description>Lack of scientific evidence in one direction or another may be enough to perpetuate the popular rejection to electromagnetic sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lack of scientific evidence in one direction or another may be enough to perpetuate the popular rejection to electromagnetic sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TW</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-7943</link>
		<dc:creator>TW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-7943</guid>
		<description>Stan, while what you say is true it is not really the issue here. The research was designed to investigate claims by people that they are "sensitive" to electro magnetic radiation. This is shown here, and in the past, to be nonsense.

The issue about long term health risks, as I said in the post, is a lot murkier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan, while what you say is true it is not really the issue here. The research was designed to investigate claims by people that they are &#8220;sensitive&#8221; to electro magnetic radiation. This is shown here, and in the past, to be nonsense.</p>
<p>The issue about long term health risks, as I said in the post, is a lot murkier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-7939</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2007/07/26/phone-masts-not-harmful/#comment-7939</guid>
		<description>It really doesn't matter if you can "feel" electromagnetic radoaition or not - If you can't feel cancer in your body, for example, it will still kill you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really doesn&#8217;t matter if you can &#8220;feel&#8221; electromagnetic radoaition or not - If you can&#8217;t feel cancer in your body, for example, it will still kill you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
