Of course, the obvious flaw is it’s based on English words. There are no set lengths for English words or phrases. (There are are rules about the placing of vowels and consonants which aren’t included in the algorithm. There are rules about sentence structure, ditto.) If the random mutation of a set length word throws up a meaningful word in Serbo-Croat, who would know?

Typical ID style argument. Appears logical and scientific at first . Look below the surface for a moment and it falls apart.

I think part of the problem is due to some schools being bad at teaching people how to think and question. Science is pretty poor at this because so much of science education involves learning “laws” and very little involves challenging thinking patterns. That’s why even scientists need to learn English and History and Social sciences…. so pseudoscientists would at least have to be willfully daft and not just daft by default.